Hi everyone!
Here are a few of the ideas that were brought up during the rehearsal. In order for the performance to happen in such a short amount of time, please add your ideas, contribute, comment and expand upon the ideas, as much as possible.
Instructions:
To edit the discussion and add ideas:
In the top right corner of the page there is a tab that says OPTIONS,
scroll down and click Edit Discussion.
To start a discussion (encouraged!) on one of the ideas, make a separate comment thread for each activity.
You are in control, so make sure you don't delete the entire conversation!
We are looking forward to hearing your responses and ideas!
Thank you!
Add a plus + next to an idea if you are interested in the activity.
Where have we taken the neutral/pedestrian body. The ordinary vs. the extraordinary body?
** Actions will unfortunately not be taking place in the lobby area
Tags:
It looks like we're itching to play with contrasts, and I'm thinking about ordinary versus extraordinary and 'pedestrian' in terms of the dance itself and have an image of: club dancing, which could happen in juxtaposition with artistic (modern or classical...) dance or simply exist in contrast to the space itself, where it's rather clearly out of place.
There was another moment during our improvisation that struck me -- James was doing what looked to my untrained eyes like some basic balletic forms, and I tried to follow him exactly; after some time of this, we found ourselves simply leaning against the wall in a casual position but aware state, still synchronized. (ordinary/extraordinary, pedestrian) This game of one person trying to follow another exactly is active and interesting to me -- and has built in the active and perhaps changing contrast of a body following movements it knows and a body following another through foreign movements. The trained versus the training.
Some of these action studies, if continued for a long time, to me may become more about endurance, persistence, and pushing limits (social, cultural, mental/emotional, physical, perceptual, etc.). This combined with the element of nudity makes me think of work that has already been done by Marina Abramović and other performance artists.
To stay focused mainly on our research themes, and given the amount of time we have to prepare, I envision an open improvisational structure that gives us freedom in what action studies/activities we engage in and for how long, and how we transition. This would provide us with an opportunity to observe what’s going on around us and to explore the boundary and relationship between viewer and participant. We could be influenced by what we see, interpreting the results our research as its happening, and let this feed back into the research. For instance, you see something in front of you, and you can join in....maybe you join in nude…maybe join in wearing a different outfit….maybe you join in and out continuously, with different facings…maybe you join in and do the study in a way different than others, offering a different interpretation. Maybe the others shift their interpretation or maybe not. Maybe you start a different study entirely to contrast, then maybe others will join you…maybe people are moving between these two activities continuously…maybe you are alone in a corner, doing the same action study repeatedly for an hour. So many possibilities.
It could be as simple as this. We make a one page Word document with our prompt at the top in italics, like:
Where have we taken the neutral/pedestrian body, the ordinary vs. extraordinary body? What are we interested in presenting 'via the body' currently and into the future? Imagine a future body.
and below that would be our list of potential action studies. We print out multiple copies of this document and tape them to the walls throughout the space at eye level for our reference. We form a pile of a variety of different clothing items and accessories we can all share, or scatter them around the space. Then we start.
This is very interesting, James. I don't know if it would serve the overall intention and plan of the event, but it's certainly appealing.
I'd like to throw speed into the mix, which somehow seems to have escaped our musings. A slow-motion dancer; a person crossing or encircling the room in slow motion; a person moving through lobby and down the stairs and through the theater in slow motion. The same fast. Two different people doing opposite speeds --- or the same person actually jumping from fast to slow motion and back again continuously throughout the process.
I would enjoy this type of investigation as well. It would in a sense dialogue what "pedestrian" speed is.
For some reason the discussion about speed made me think about touch. What kind of touch is pedestrian? ordinary? extraordinary? intentional or unintentional? when we are smashed against each other on the subway or bumping into each other on the street, this to me is unintentional/ pedestrian. if i bump into someone on the street accidentally should i apologize? was it a bad thing? will the person i bumped into take it personally and be offended? i am also recalling what cesar brought up about fighting and making love as the most intense forms of human contact, versus shaking hands, etc.
You guys have been great with all this ideas so far. I am now with Shige and we have been reading and discussing all your ideas. As you know there is only so much we can do giving the time we have, so we will prepare the structure for the days. Also I will lead the days as if we were in a workshop. To allow for both , the time for discussion, or notes as well as for individual or ensemble explorations. Unfortunately we won't be able to use the lobby. And in fact our actions will have to happen inside the theater and no at other space of the museum...!
I will be posting here again soon. For now please be prepare for tomorrow Tuesday!
Thank you,
Ximena
© 2025 Created by LEIMAY.
Powered by